Thursday, March 27, 2014
Wednesday, March 26, 2014
Where are the flying saucer “fossils”?
Posted on 8:15 AM by jackline
The Alien Astronaut theorists and a few UFO quidnuncs tell us that flying saucers or UFOs have been visiting the Earth for thousands, maybe millions of years.
And some UFO buffs insist that flying saucer or UFO crashes have been almost epidemic since 1947, those crashes covered up by government militaries.
But let me address the many-year visiting UFOs/saucers.
If craft from somewhere else has been visiting the Earth for millennia, and their current configurations are crash prone (Aurora, Roswell, Aztec, Kecksburg, et cetera), why has no one ever discovered the remnants of a crashed saucer/UFO anywhere on Earth, before the cover-up era?
Why haven’t explorers stumbled upon a metallic or solid substance entity that would be identifiable as an odd construct, out of place or time?
Explorers and paleontologists have come upon odd things in the sands, mountains, jungles, snow fields of Earth and placed those finds in museums or noted them in journals.
But no one, ever, has described a flying saucer “fossil.”
Yes, the AA theorists will point to things like the Palenque sarcophagus lid as indication of an alien space craft, but that interpretation is iffy, and no craft is represented or was found among the areas other archaeological debris fields.
Stanley or Livingston never found anything in Africa that could be identified as a vehicle or airborne craft.
Nor did Marco Polo in China, or Herodotus in and around the Mediterranean.
Lewis and Clark didn’t come upon a downed saucer or anything like one.
No one ever found the remains of the supposed Airships of the 1890s, although those alleged crafts were reportedly (by witnesses) to be accident-prone or had troubled flights.
No Egyptian hieroglyph depicts a downed saucer.
But then, in the modern era, writers, such as Kevin Randle, tell us that flying saucers have crashed all over the place, only to be smothered by government interference and secrecy.
But before this paranoid era – back in the good ol’ days of unfettered discovery – no noted explorer or romantic traveler to far off, unknown realms ever wrote or said they had discovered an out of place, odd artifact that one could discern, today, as a crashed flying disk.
Dinosaur fossils have shown up everywhere. But nothing like a downed UFO.
What does that tell us?
That the whole flying saucer thing is hooey, or UFOs are a phenomenon without substance, the creatures of myth – evanescent and without substance, then and now.
RR
Wednesday, March 19, 2014
Monday, March 17, 2014
And scientists think ufologists are nuts?
Posted on 1:55 PM by jackline
The whole universe, from a single point the size of an atom? (I don't think so.)
http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/science/2014/03/17/harvard-led-team-detects-gravitational-waves-evidence-cosmic-inflation/nvWTo5iSyhbMauKD1GegsK/story.html
RR
http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/science/2014/03/17/harvard-led-team-detects-gravitational-waves-evidence-cosmic-inflation/nvWTo5iSyhbMauKD1GegsK/story.html
RR
Friday, March 14, 2014
Ufology's Underbelly
Posted on 9:45 AM by jackline
Anthony Bragalia provides an overview of the seedier aspects of ufology: the UFO community's reprobates.
Click HERE to see his piece (at his personal blog).
Click HERE to see his piece (at his personal blog).
Thursday, March 13, 2014
Shaver and/or Tonnies were actually on to something?
Posted on 12:14 PM by jackline
Wednesday, March 12, 2014
UFO Discourse or Dogmatism?
Posted on 8:15 AM by jackline
The Anomalist wishes that I’d engage in discourse with UFO aficionados rather than issue in what they see as dogmatic broadsides.
Discourse with UFO mavens?
That would be like having talks with a room full of monkeys.
And example may be seen by looking at the current comments at Kevin Randles blog, by Rick Hall and Nitram Ang.
These sycophants take to task the visitors here and comments made about the Roswell slides, about which they know jack-shit.
Mr. Randle’s problem has always been his democratic approach to UFO witnesses and persons commenting at his blog: everything is grist for presentation, no matter how asinine or errant.
Mr. Randle has been trying to correct his legacy with mea culpa’s about his past use of lying Roswell witnesses.
But he still insists providing carte blanche to bone-heads at his blog, persons who lick his boots only to be in the presence of a UFO notable.
Rick Hall is pissed because I don’t allow his comments an airing in this spot.
For me, it’s quality over quantity, and in Hall’s case, it’s a matter of not allowing garbage and ignorance to appear here.
Up next, I’ll provide comments on the deviants who roam the halls of the UFO community, one in jail, and one continuously spewing vile and vulgar comments trying to cover his tracks as a child pornographer.
RR
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


