First Elon Musk and now Stephen Hawking: Beware the ...

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, October 13, 2013

Morphic Resonance?

Posted on 8:02 AM by jackline
The Anomalist bemoans [10-13-2013] the status of (non)discussion about Rupert Sheldrake’s idea of Morphic Resonance, Anomalist taking to task skeptics and others for not even giving the topic an iota of attention.

Our recent posting here about the possibility of plants being the flyers of UFOs, and the PSI experiments regarding botanical life in the book The Secret Life of Plants allows one to conclude that we (I) find the idea of Morphic Resonance a possibility.

The Sheldrakian idea that all of biology is connected  in some way by a “force” or “resonance” and affected by that “resonance” in beneficial (or debilitating perhaps) ways.

But why, Anomalist asks, isn’t this a subject for discussion or debate in the circles that Anomalist pays attention to?

Out recent posting, after our Secret Life if Plants efflort, Ufological Bozos, tells Anomalist why there is no discussion of Morphic Resonance or anything else that requires intellectual ratiocination.

We get visitors here who get irked when we post things fringy or take them to task for comments that don’t address our posting – the off-topic syndrome.

We find ourselves dealing with UFO prima donnas, who think their views should be ours or that their views are magnificently created and should get attention by us directing our visitors to their blogs.

We (me mostly) are elitists.

We eschew the bumpkins who tried to insert their views and their egos here.

That Morphic Resonance and Rupert Sheldrake, among others, are ignored or their ideas are not explored doesn’t surprise.

The concept is edgy and complex, difficult for the simplistic minds of most (if not all) UFO aficionados.

UFOs attract a kind of person bereft of deep thought – us included sometimes.

The topic is a joke and treated as such by thinkers, academic and otherwise.

Trying to thrust deep-thought and rational discussion on the UFO crowd is like trying to capture the ocean with a bucket.

So, Anomalist….your distress is ours, but neither you nor us will have that distress assuaged by addressing it. UFO mavens are incompetent to comprehend their own stupidity and ignorance.

That’s just the way it is…..truly.

RR 
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Solid light and the Burkes Flat UFO of 1966
    While looking for UFO sightings in the time-frame of the 1966 Ann Arbor/Dexter/Hillsdale “swamp gas” sightings, I came across the Burkes Fla...
  • A few odd UFO encounters
    Jan Wolski: The craft encountered by Wolski, May 1978 (courtesy of Harry Trumbore). Not recommended for interstellar travel! http://en.wikip...
  • James Moseley's "Saucer Smear" (2005)
    For those who've never seen or read the grand, snarky Saucer Smear by Jim Moseley, here's a copy (which contains something from our...
  • Machines, not little gray beings pilot UFOs, but that doesn't affect our everyday life.
    http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/what-if-abc-news/real-alien-wouldn-t-green-bald-171646584.html
  • The William Rhodes UFO Photo
    Why don't we see UFO photos like this one nowadays, even a hoaxed photo? Kevin Randle had a 2010 posting about Mr. Rhodes and his photo:...
  • Aliens are watching Earth's TV? OMG!
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/11/04/kepler_earth_like_planets_habitable/
  • LIght on Mars proves the movie Rocketship X-M was prophetic
    http://www.cnet.com/news/mysterious-light-in-mars-image-sparks-curiosity/
  • UFOs: The Fascinating Eras
    Copyright 2014, InterAmerica, Inc. UFOs, as an evanescent phenomenon or a serious phenomenon, remain for some of us an intriguing mystery. I...
  • And scientists think ufologists are nuts?
    The whole universe, from a single point the size of an atom? (I don't think so.) http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/science/2014/03/17/harv...
  • Quantum Teleportation
    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/30/science/scientists-report-finding-reliable-way-to-teleport-data.html?_r=0

Blog Archive

  • ►  2015 (14)
    • ►  January (14)
  • ►  2014 (394)
    • ►  December (41)
    • ►  November (47)
    • ►  October (40)
    • ►  September (36)
    • ►  August (47)
    • ►  July (41)
    • ►  June (36)
    • ►  May (25)
    • ►  April (11)
    • ►  March (13)
    • ►  February (24)
    • ►  January (33)
  • ▼  2013 (82)
    • ►  December (26)
    • ►  November (27)
    • ▼  October (29)
      • JFK Assassination Article: Primer for Roswell
      • Missing files, for Roswell, and other UFO-related ...
      • Ancient Astronaut Theory, Joseph Campbell, et cetera
      • The New York Times' misinformation about Roswell, ...
      • The site (source?) of Mac Tonnies’ “crypto-terrest...
      • Queen Victoria’s Saucerman
      • Hip skeptic or Hipster Doophus?
      • Philistines are everywhere, not just in the UFO arena
      • A Confederacy of Dunces
      • UFO Skepticism: Good or Bad?
      • How NOT to be famous (in Ufology or anything else)
      • Wilhelm Reich and Roswell
      • Alien Abductions: A Mental Aberration
      • Another sea serpent?
      • What do we really have (regarding UFOs)?
      • Hare today, Gone tomorrow by Jose Antonio Caravaca
      • A Remembrance: Mac Tonnies
      • The Polar Bear's Cousin?
      • Nick Redfern’s new book: For Nobody’s Eyes Only
      • Nick Redfern on Soviet Saucers
      • Yes, A Real Sea Serpent!
      • Not a UFO!
      • An Indirect Proof for a Roswell Flying Disk Crash?
      • Morphic Resonance?
      • Ancient UFO Visitations?
      • Cave Art: It's by women artists!
      • Nick Redfern's latest outing: a new book!
      • The Trickster: Ufology’s go-to concept for almost ...
      • Roswell 101: A primer for those who haven’t been p...
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

jackline
View my complete profile