First Elon Musk and now Stephen Hawking: Beware the ...

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, May 27, 2014

The Roswell/Rendlesham Competition

Posted on 7:11 AM by jackline
After the 1978 promotion of Roswell by Stanton Friedman et al., many countries vied to produce their own Roswell incident.

Today, the U.K. ufologists, boosted by our friend Nick Pope, have almost made the December 1980 Rendlesham episode as noteworthy in UFO lore as Roswell has become.

The 1980 affair has developed into a mythos not unlike the Roswell “event” but without dead alien bodies and an official military press release.

The current take on the Rendlesham “sighting” is heralded by men who were stationed at a military base nearby [Bentwaters/Woodbridge] and on patrol at the edge of the Rendlesham forest.

The two heaviest hitters for a Rendlesham extraterresrial visitation are John Burroughs and Jim Penniston, both making extensive television and conference appearances to tout their story that they encountered an alien craft in Rendlesham forest.

Since 1980, both men, and their commanding officer Charles Halt, have come to believe and proselytize their “encounter” as an extraterrestrial encounter.

But watching the three men, and in particular, Burroughs and Penniston, one has to come to the psychiatric conclusion that these fellows are enmeshed in a folie à deux or folie à trios – a “communicated insanity” [Psychiatric Dictionary, Fourth Edition, Hinsie and Campbell, Oxford University Press, 1970].

That is, these men did experience an unusual observation but, over the years, have extrapolated that observation, abetted by UFO researchers and buffs, into something quite beyond what actually occurred.

I won’t go into the vicissitudes of the evolutionary delusion because my point is that the UK contingent of ufologists – those on the believing end of UFO as ET craft – are pushing and have been pushing for several years now to make the Rendlesham incident comparable to the Roswell incident.

They want pride of place in the ufological pantheon just as some U.S. UFO researchers have garnered from Roswell.

Why?

UFOs make those involved a little or a lot crazy.

Facts and reality are set aside for fiction and contrived psychotic imaginings.

RR
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Solid light and the Burkes Flat UFO of 1966
    While looking for UFO sightings in the time-frame of the 1966 Ann Arbor/Dexter/Hillsdale “swamp gas” sightings, I came across the Burkes Fla...
  • A few odd UFO encounters
    Jan Wolski: The craft encountered by Wolski, May 1978 (courtesy of Harry Trumbore). Not recommended for interstellar travel! http://en.wikip...
  • James Moseley's "Saucer Smear" (2005)
    For those who've never seen or read the grand, snarky Saucer Smear by Jim Moseley, here's a copy (which contains something from our...
  • Machines, not little gray beings pilot UFOs, but that doesn't affect our everyday life.
    http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/what-if-abc-news/real-alien-wouldn-t-green-bald-171646584.html
  • The William Rhodes UFO Photo
    Why don't we see UFO photos like this one nowadays, even a hoaxed photo? Kevin Randle had a 2010 posting about Mr. Rhodes and his photo:...
  • Aliens are watching Earth's TV? OMG!
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/11/04/kepler_earth_like_planets_habitable/
  • LIght on Mars proves the movie Rocketship X-M was prophetic
    http://www.cnet.com/news/mysterious-light-in-mars-image-sparks-curiosity/
  • UFOs: The Fascinating Eras
    Copyright 2014, InterAmerica, Inc. UFOs, as an evanescent phenomenon or a serious phenomenon, remain for some of us an intriguing mystery. I...
  • And scientists think ufologists are nuts?
    The whole universe, from a single point the size of an atom? (I don't think so.) http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/science/2014/03/17/harv...
  • Quantum Teleportation
    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/30/science/scientists-report-finding-reliable-way-to-teleport-data.html?_r=0

Blog Archive

  • ►  2015 (14)
    • ►  January (14)
  • ▼  2014 (394)
    • ►  December (41)
    • ►  November (47)
    • ►  October (40)
    • ►  September (36)
    • ►  August (47)
    • ►  July (41)
    • ►  June (36)
    • ▼  May (25)
      • Quantum Teleportation
      • Inter-dimensional UFOs (and beings)?
      • Roswell, The U.S. Navy, and flying saucers/disks (...
      • The Roswell/Rendlesham Competition
      • UFOs: A Sign to be Something, to do Something
      • A methodology (or ruse) that UFO researchers might...
      • What do you think?
      • A UFO Technology?
      • Yes, there may be alien life out there but is it f...
      • The elusiveness of an MJ-12-like group
      • The Navy's "Flying Saucer"
      • Being knowledgeable about UFOs (and Roswell?)
      • Nick Redfern and his Indiana Jones approach to Ros...
      • Turning light into matter
      • Solid light and the Burkes Flat UFO of 1966
      • The FBI and Flying Disks, plus a mysterious AJB in...
      • The UFO Black Hole: Roswell
      • The Roswell Flying Disk (and a good book about UFO...
      • UFO Report (or Japanese Balloon) in Air Force Comm...
      • Ufologists are a sloppy lot
      • Roswell, Lincoln LaPaz, and Green Fireballs
      • Watch The Universe form!
      • Those Green Fireballs
      • NASA's Rover captures UFO in Mars sky?
      • Roswell Mogul Balloon Explanation: A Cover-Up by A...
    • ►  April (11)
    • ►  March (13)
    • ►  February (24)
    • ►  January (33)
  • ►  2013 (82)
    • ►  December (26)
    • ►  November (27)
    • ►  October (29)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

jackline
View my complete profile