First Elon Musk and now Stephen Hawking: Beware the ...

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

The Roswell Slides Context

Posted on 10:49 AM by jackline
Many of you have questions about the situation with the so-called Roswell Slide(s).

Here’s what I know…

The Team doesn’t have its ducks in a row.

They know that the Kodachrome film was extant in 1947 and the photo(s) taken with it were probably taken in that time-frame, but they can’t prove that.

They also don’t know who took the photo(s); they have a guess, but that’s all they have.

They don’t know where the film was taken – locale. They think it’s near Roswell but that is a guess also.

They have no idea what the photo(s) show….a “body” apparently, but there is no way to determine what kind of body – real or simulated, or ???

The Team is trying to put together a scenario but they have no access to first-hand participants.

They have a Chicago guy who got the slides from his sister who found them in a trunk during and estate sale.

The possessor has no connection to the slides – direct or indirect. He’s just a guy hoping to capitalize on the things, hyped by Tom Carey as Roswell in nature.

Tom Carey is intrigued because he’s a Roswellian and wants to resolve that incident.

Don Schmitt wants to capitalize monetarily I think.

David Rudiak is a Roswell fanatic. He’s obsessed with Roswell and needs to keep scratching that itch.

Anthony Bragalia wants to be a UFO notable. He desires cachet and fame as a “ufologist” which I don’t get. Having UFO notoriety is anathema to persons who value dignity and common sense.

Chris Rutkowski is almost involved but a silent partner, one who should get out before his inestimable credibility is shot to hell by the Slides farce.

Kevin Randle wanted to clear up his beleaguered Roswell credibility but snookered that by playing fast and loose with the Slides story, nailed by Paul Kimball for prevaricating the issue.

So that’s where we are: the Slides will get a public airing this year, sometime, somehow.

But it will be akin to the Alien Autopsy film, in content and denouement; that is, it will end up being one more ufological joke that besmirches all involved.

RR
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • THE HUMANOID OF THE ROSWELL SLIDES by Jose Antonio Caravaca
    After talking with some researchers who have seen the slides, we can try to reconstruct the possible semblance of humanoid that shown in the...
  • And now it's the Roswell Rock
    The History2 Channel, Friday, 8/15/14, presented an hour long airing about a rock found near Roswell in 2004 that is ostensibly connected to...
  • Aha! Found...
    Back on October 28th (2014) I noted that this book mysteriously disappeared from my rooms: I found the book today, December 7, 2014, underne...
  • An Odd But Interesting UFO Contact Story
    While reading an archive blotch, I found this tidbit in an internet-capture: Australian Centre for UFO Studies Issue # 3, June 2005 Editor :...
  • An abduction account (from our previous UFO incarnation -- 2005)
    In the November 1977 issue of UFO Report, Jerome (Jerry) Clark recounts an abduction case that is intriguing in a number of ways. The event ...
  • Mac Brazel's Roswell Find: Balloon Debris but not Mogul Debris!
    Some Roswellian advocates insist upon the idea that Mac Brazel found debris from a crashed flying disk, from which the errant Haut press rel...
  • Mars: A 3-D Video
    http://news.yahoo.com/video/mars-3d-flyover-video-140815389.html
  • Gaines M Crook's rejected MUFON article on UFOs and Electromagnetism
    Joel Crook has provided us with some of his father's musings on UFOs. We've placed and will be placing some of that material at our ...
  • A paper that puts Roswell and other UFO things in perspective
    Dead on Arrival? The Development of the Aerospace Concept, 1944–58 by STEPHEN M. ROTHSTEIN, MAJOR, USAF School of Advanced Airpower Studies ...
  • An April 30th 1964 UPI Story about the Socorro Sighting and Symbol
    Don asked, earlier here, when the Socorro/Lonni Zamora inverted V with three lines through it was first mentioned. Here's a UPI newspape...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2015 (14)
    • ►  January (14)
  • ▼  2014 (394)
    • ►  December (41)
    • ►  November (47)
    • ►  October (40)
    • ►  September (36)
    • ►  August (47)
    • ►  July (41)
    • ►  June (36)
    • ►  May (25)
    • ►  April (11)
    • ►  March (13)
    • ▼  February (24)
      • Look! A UFO!
      • Lots of Habitable Planets: None with UFOs?
      • UFO Faith, UFO Atheism, and UFO Nescience
      • The Origin of the Roswell Slide(s) Story?
      • My Aversion to the Roswell Slide Team’s Efforts
      • The Roswell Slides Context
      • The Twilight of UFOs (despite The Roswell Slides)
      • UFO Skeptic(s) Dismissed Causes Frustration and Wrath
      • Venus: Not a UFO
      • Nick Redfern on Howard Hughes and UFOs
      • Was Socorro a college prank? No, but….
      • French Uber-Skeptic Gilles Fernandez will hate this!
      • Gaines M Crook: An "Abduction Experience" (or some...
      • Gaines M Crook: Two items you might find interesting
      • Again, What Intergalactic Society Would Spot Earth...
      • Blowback on Science and UFOs
      • Facebook and the UFO Phenomenon
      • Gaines M Crook on the UFO "Dilemma" and its Solution
      • A Letter to Jerry Clark from Gaines M Crook [1991]
      • Gaines M Crook "critiques" Len Stringfield's "UFO ...
      • Gaines Crook on a Gulf Breeze Anomaly
      • What is NASA really up to?
      • Not alien landing marks after all...
      • Gaines Crook: A Man With Great Insight
    • ►  January (33)
  • ►  2013 (82)
    • ►  December (26)
    • ►  November (27)
    • ►  October (29)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

jackline
View my complete profile