First Elon Musk and now Stephen Hawking: Beware the ...

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, June 2, 2014

Are UFOs a mystical experience or a technological experience?

Posted on 9:47 AM by jackline
Which of the two experiences in my title above is more prominent in the UFO panoply or history?

It seems that quantum mechanics is the underlying “process” or modus operandi – the supportive mechanism -- operating within or without events that have been, mostly in the past, considered mystical – the appearances of a woman thought to be Mary the mother of Jesus (at Lourdes and Fatima, for instance) – and UFO sightings, up to the modern era.

In the middle 1890s and certainly after 1945, UFOs have been considered with a technological patina,

(The Roswell incident cemented such a view, with the alleged finding of “metal debris” or a craft, and bodies from supposed extraterrestrials who piloted the downs flying disk mentioned in a military press release.)

But it seems that there is an evanescent overlay to UFOs seen in the sky and even in those on-the-ground contacts with weird entities.

In ancient sightings, the reports were appended to religious or mythical tales.

In modern times, UFO accounts have been encrusted with a technological veneer.

This latter change can be attributed to the loss of religious milieux in society.

But whether or not UFOs, over the years or in our time, are mystical or technological matters not.

The procedure by which they arrive or are seen – experienced – seems to follow the mechanics of quantum, and a few postings here recently, noted by Joel Crook, from the science community seem to confirm a quantum basis for UFO sightings or events.

This would appear to be basis for study by UFO buffs, setting aside the extraterrestrial component, although the ETH could also benefit from a quantum underbelly.

RR
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • An Odd But Interesting UFO Contact Story
    While reading an archive blotch, I found this tidbit in an internet-capture: Australian Centre for UFO Studies Issue # 3, June 2005 Editor :...
  • Gaines M Crook's rejected MUFON article on UFOs and Electromagnetism
    Joel Crook has provided us with some of his father's musings on UFOs. We've placed and will be placing some of that material at our ...
  • THE HUMANOID OF THE ROSWELL SLIDES by Jose Antonio Caravaca
    After talking with some researchers who have seen the slides, we can try to reconstruct the possible semblance of humanoid that shown in the...
  • Aha! Found...
    Back on October 28th (2014) I noted that this book mysteriously disappeared from my rooms: I found the book today, December 7, 2014, underne...
  • A paper that puts Roswell and other UFO things in perspective
    Dead on Arrival? The Development of the Aerospace Concept, 1944–58 by STEPHEN M. ROTHSTEIN, MAJOR, USAF School of Advanced Airpower Studies ...
  • An abduction account (from our previous UFO incarnation -- 2005)
    In the November 1977 issue of UFO Report, Jerome (Jerry) Clark recounts an abduction case that is intriguing in a number of ways. The event ...
  • And now it's the Roswell Rock
    The History2 Channel, Friday, 8/15/14, presented an hour long airing about a rock found near Roswell in 2004 that is ostensibly connected to...
  • Mars: A 3-D Video
    http://news.yahoo.com/video/mars-3d-flyover-video-140815389.html
  • Mac Brazel's Roswell Find: Balloon Debris but not Mogul Debris!
    Some Roswellian advocates insist upon the idea that Mac Brazel found debris from a crashed flying disk, from which the errant Haut press rel...
  • Haha?

Blog Archive

  • ►  2015 (14)
    • ►  January (14)
  • ▼  2014 (394)
    • ►  December (41)
    • ►  November (47)
    • ►  October (40)
    • ►  September (36)
    • ►  August (47)
    • ►  July (41)
    • ▼  June (36)
      • Those 1561/1566 Woodcuttings are “Editorial Cartoo...
      • You tell me Martians won't start their own Roswell...
      • Bird Watching and Ufology
      • AIR FORCE SCIENCE COMMANDER: “MORE ROSWELL DEBRIS ...
      • Arguments and Counter-Arguments to my Trent/McMinn...
      • The Trent/McMinnville UFO is a Ford Side-View Mirror?
      • Madness and UFOs
      • A Socorro-like incident in 1790 France?
      • A Titan Mystery
      • UFO Buffs are NOT Intellectual Gourmands!
      • Uri Geller and the Roswell Memory Metal
      • The NSA, Edward Snowden, and Nick Redfern
      • The First Step in Deflating The Big Bang Theory?
      • How Can Such UFO Reports as These Be Explained, Ra...
      • Symbolism: Socorro and Otherwise
      • The End of the World [circa 250 A.D.] -- No UFO Help.
      • An April 30th 1964 UPI Story about the Socorro Sig...
      • The Failure of the ETH (The Extraterrestrial Hypot...
      • Verification of One Socorro Symbol
      • Betty Hill's Alien Book and The Adamski/Orthon Sho...
      • Was this a more significant event than Roswell?
      • The Roswell Hat
      • NASA's "Flying Saucer"?
      • Murder Most Foul (in the UFO Arena)
      • The UFO “Zone"
      • Close Encounters of the Fatal Kind: A Review
      • UFOs, Condon, and RR in 1967!
      • Ufology’s Lost Generation
      • Velikovsky vindicated?
      • UFO Memory
      • The Socorro Symbol
      • A Fictional Character not unlike Ufological creatu...
      • Nick Redfern's latest book....
      • The Great Mistake about Roswell
      • Roswell heating up again?
      • Are UFOs a mystical experience or a technological ...
    • ►  May (25)
    • ►  April (11)
    • ►  March (13)
    • ►  February (24)
    • ►  January (33)
  • ►  2013 (82)
    • ►  December (26)
    • ►  November (27)
    • ►  October (29)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

jackline
View my complete profile